Vladimir Horowitz (1903-89), Arturo Toscanini (1867-1957)
Pristine Classical is a company devoted to the restoration of 78 and LP recordings whose qualities were impaired by early recording technologies, the vagaries of electrical currents which often fluctuated during the recording process, inadequate storage of tapes and metal masters or scratchy surfaces. Andrew Rose, Pristine’s founder and chief restorer, refrains from going too far in his clean ups yet manages to bring to life nuances which, though recorded, were not clearly audible on masters or commercial 78s or vinyl pressings. His and other views on restoration and its techniques are contained in an interesting article by Alex Ross titled Infinite Playlist in Musical Events, The New Yorker, August 10, 2009.
I joined Pristine Classical online and every week a news letter arrives featuring the latest restorations, some selections from past issues and a lengthy article by Ross about some part of the recording business of particular interest to him. It’s his blog. His articles are well written and very interesting, particularly to this neophyte. What I go for are the full length audio clips, an entire movement of a piano sonata for instance, demonstrating the final results of his work. There are usually two or three of these in every newsletter along with various sound formats available priced according to quality. The artists are “giants” from the past – Furtwangler, Philharmonia Orchestra, Beethoven’s 9th Symphony recorded live at the Luzerne Festival with Elizabeth Schwarzkopf etal. There is an extensive archive organized by composer, and perusing the gems therein, each with an audio sample, could keep one occupied for many hours. Orders are filled promptly.
A recent purchase of mine from Pristine Classical was the iconic Vladimir Horowitz, Toscanini, NBC Symphony Orchestra collaboration on Tchaikovsky’s 1st Piano Concerto recorded (not live) in Carnegie Hall in 1941. I chose this restoration because of its reputation. I owned a full score and a number of recent recordings of the concerto on CD, and the famous RCA Victor LP version with Van Cliburn and Kiril Kondrashin (1914-81). These sources provided a solid base upon which to compare.
As a college freshman I became caught up in the Cold War fervor surrounding Harvey Lavan (Van) Cliburn, Jr’s (b.1934 -) winning of the 1st quadrennial Tchaikovsky Competition in 1958 in Moscow and was given the LP recording as a Christmas present the same year. But truth be told, I never enjoyed the work. The opening horn calls and piano chords seemed ponderous and most of the piano flourishes seemed unanchored to the whole. Time had not assuaged my opinions. Then the Horowitz recording arrived.
I was stunned. My first thought was, “Can this intensity last?” “Yes”, was the answer. True, even with the help of Andrew Rose and Pristine Classical’s sophisticated technologies, the sound quality was inferior in some ways to modern recordings and many inner voices were barely audible. But the superb pianistic and musical accomplishments and the frisson of excitement I felt are nowhere replicated in more modern recordings.
In preparation for this article I listened to my 1958 LP and a few other CD recordings of the Tchaikovsky concerto. I was once again stunned. For recording quality, clarity of orchestral voices and balance throughout, the 1958 vinyl LP wins running away. I had not listened to this recording in over forty years and only a “pop” or two marred its’ surface. Van Cliburn’s tempo is very slow or as one friend said, “majestic”. [1.]
Many of the performances of this work feel in some way tired or predictable. The concerto is a warhorse and that’s one of its problems, and perhaps one of mine. (A 1980 CD live performance by a favorite pianist of mine, also conducted by Kondrashin, made me wonder why I’d spent the money.) The Horowitz performance however is a revelation in interpretation and should be heard by anyone interested in hearing a work transformed by a great artist. His command of form and structure is total. His blazing forays through the aforementioned pianistic flourishes give them meaning and bind the work together. The 1st movement cadenza alone is an astounding work of artful understanding.
The virtuosity is overwhelming and may be first to capture one’s attention. Horowitz’s interpretation of the work is 7 to 10 minutes shorter then other recordings and for me this brevity helps to make the work more compact and palatable. At the time of this recording Toscanini was 74 years old and Horowitz, then 39, had been married to Wanda, Toscanini’s daughter, for eight years. Younger generations of pianists dubbed Horowitz “TheMaster of Octaves” and there are plenty enough in this recording to second their motion, but listening to Horowitz play the delicate floating tones which contrast with technical passages, proves his complete mastery. There is much much more at work here then fingers.
Another Horowitz, Toscanini, Tchaikovsky recording dating from the early 1940s is the 1943 Carnegie Hall live recording. This version is considered by many to be superior to 1941 and was elected to the Grammy Hall of Fame. Toscanini, Horowitz and the NBC Symphony Orchestra made this recording “live” before an invited audience which purchased War Bonds for their seats. It was the hottest ticket in the history of New York City. At the end of the concert, Toscanini’s personally annotated conductor’s score was put to auction. The evening raised $11,000,000.
We may all have experienced the cloud of questioning which descends upon us as we are about to compare an old favorite with something new. Can we be objective? There is no doubt about the superior sound of the 1943 commercial recording when compared to Andrew Rose’s reconstruction of the 1941. Some orchestral voices not immediately apparent on the Van Cliburn LP are clearly audible here and the piano sound is more present. Still the frisson mentioned above is missing and, though I’m definitely in the minority, it sounds careful to me. Get both the Rose ’41 reconstruction and the live ’43 War Bonds concert on RCA. The bonus on RCA Victor is Beethoven’s Fifth Piano Concerto recorded nine years later with Reiner conducting the RCA Victor Symphony. There are moments so sublime, they defy comment. The only recording I have that reaches some of the heights Horowitz ascends in the Beethoven, is a bootleg with Arturo Benedetto Michelangeli, Celibidache conducting the Swedish Radio Orchestra, 1969(?).
Harold C. Schonberg, long the senior music critic for The New York Times and the author of “The Great Pianists,” wrote: “As a technician Horowitz was one of the most honest in the history of modern pianism. He achieved his dazzling effects by fingers alone, using the pedal sparingly. Notes of scales could not be more evenly matched (his Scarlatti was technically fabulous); chords could not be attacked more precisely; octaves could not be sharper or more exciting; leaps could not be hit more accurately.
A Horowitz performance of Rachmaninoff’s 3rd Concerto awed the composer, himself a piano virtuoso of awesome ability, to proclaim “He swallowed it whole. He had the courage, the intensity, the daring.”. (Wikipedia) Frisson indeed!
Foot Notes:
[1.] The RCA Victor LP 2252 Red Seal with Van Cliburn and Kondrashin was recorded in Carnegie Hall in 1958. Though Van Cliburn was accompanied during the Tchaikovsky Competition by the Moscow Radio Orchestra, the Carnegie Hall recording was made with the RCA Victor Symphony Orchestra. This orchestra had been founded in 1940 by RCA in response to Columbia Records contract with the Philadelphia Orchestra and other commercial pressures stemming from the ever burgeoning recording industry. Headquartered in Camden, New Jersey, it was made up of New York City’s finest players.
Victor’s NYC players came from the Philharmonic, the Met, the City Center and NBC Orchestras and radio staff musicians. When Fritz Reiner entered the picture in1950, contractors of his choosing engaged the requisite number of players thereby guaranteeing performance consistency.
Robin Engelman 
Unexceptionalism: A Primer by E. L. Doctorow
The New York Times, April 28, 1012
From April 30 to May 6, 100 writers from 25 countries will be in New York for a festival sponsored by the PEN American Center. As part of the festival, A. O. Scott, a critic for The New York Times, will talk with the writers Martin Amis, Margaret Atwood and E. L. Doctorow at a Times Talk event on May 2, co-sponsored by the Consulate General of Canada in New York. We asked those three writers — Ms. Atwood from Canada, Mr. Amis from Britain and Mr. Doctorow from the United States — to consider the question of America and its role in global political culture. Here is Mr. Doctorow’s answer.
PHASE ONE
If you’re a justice of the Supreme Court, ignore the first sacrament of a democracy and suspend the counting of ballots in a presidential election. Appoint the candidate of your choice as president.
If you’re the newly anointed president, react to a terrorist attack by invading a nonterrorist country. Despite the loss or disablement of untold numbers of lives, manage your war so that its results will be indeterminate.
Using the state of war as justification, order secret
Unexceptionalism: A Primer
By E. L. DOCTOROW
TO achieve unexceptionalism, the political ideal that would render the United States indistinguishable from the impoverished, traditionally undemocratic, brutal or catatonic countries of the world, do the following:
PHASE ONE
If you’re a justice of the Supreme Court, ignore the first sacrament of a democracy and suspend the counting of ballots in a presidential election. Appoint the candidate of your choice as president.
If you’re the newly anointed president, react to a terrorist attack by invading a nonterrorist country. Despite the loss or disablement of untold numbers of lives, manage your war so that its results will be indeterminate.
Using the state of war as justification, order secret surveillance of American citizens, data mine their phone calls and e-mail, make business, medical and public library records available to government agencies, perform illegal warrantless searches of homes and offices.
Take to torturing terrorism suspects, here or abroad, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment. Unilaterally abrogate the Convention Against Torture as well as the Geneva Conventions regarding the treatment of prisoners of war. Commit to indeterminate detention without trial those you decide are enemies. For good measure, trust that legislative supporters will eventually apply this policy as well to American citizens.
Suspend progressive taxation so that the wealthiest pay less proportionately than the middle class. See to it that the wealth of the country accumulates to a small fraction of the population so that the gap between rich and poor widens exponentially.
By cutting taxes and raising wartime expenditures, deplete the national treasury so that Congress and state and municipal legislatures cut back on domestic services, ensuring that there will be less money for the education of the young, for government health programs, for the care of veterans, for the maintenance of roads and bridges, for free public libraries, and so forth.
Deregulate the banking industry so as to create a severe recession in which enormous numbers of people lose their homes and jobs.
Before you leave office add to the Supreme Court justices like the ones who awarded you the presidency.
PHASE TWO
If you’re one of the conservative majority of a refurbished Supreme Court, rule that corporations, no less than human beings, have the right under the First Amendment to express their political point of view. To come to this judgment, do not acknowledge that corporations lack the range of feelings or values that define what it is to be human. That humans can act against their own interest, whereas corporations cannot act otherwise than in their own interest. That the corporation’s only purpose is to produce wealth, regardless of social consequences.
This decision of the court will ensure tremendous infusions of corporate money into the political process and lead to the election in national and state legislatures of majorities of de facto corporate lobbyists.
PHASE THREE
Given corporate control of legislative bodies, enact laws to the benefit of corporate interests. For example, those laws sponsored by weapons manufacturers wherein people may carry concealed weapons and shoot and kill anyone by whom they feel threatened.
Give the running of state prisons over to private corporations whose profits increase with the increase in inmate populations. See to it that a majority of prisoners are African-American.
When possible, treat immigrants as criminals.
Deplete and underfinance a viable system of free public schools and give the education of children over to private for-profit corporations.
Make college education unaffordable.
Inject religious precepts into public policy so as to control women’s bodies.
Enact laws prohibiting collective bargaining. Portray trade unions as un-American.
Enact laws restricting the voting rights of possibly unruly constituencies.
Propagandize against scientific facts that would affect corporate profits. Portray global warming as a conspiracy of scientists.
Having subverted the Constitution and enervated the nation with these measures, portray the federal government as unwieldy, bumbling and shot through with elitist liberals. Create mental states of maladaptive populism among the citizenry to support this view.
PHASE FOUR
If you’re a justice of the Supreme Court, decide that the police of any and all cities and towns and villages have the absolute authority to strip-search any person whom they, for whatever reason, put under arrest.
With this ruling, the reduction of America to unexceptionalism is complete.
E. L. Doctorow is the author, most recently of the novel “Homer and Langley.”
Posted by robinengelman on May 1, 2012 in Articles, Commentaries & Critiques