RSS

Category Archives: History

AN ACCIDENTAL DISCOVERY

Frieze over a window in  King Ludwig II  (1845-86) ersatz Versailles, Herrenchiemsee on Lake Chiemsee, Bavaria, begun in 1873.

Frieze over a window in King Ludwig II (1845-86) ersatz Versailles, Herrenchiemsee on Lake Chiemsee, Bavaria, begun in 1873.

DSCN1862

A holiday in Germany with friends. All the details were taken care of beforehand. We were to tour Germany -their Germany. One of the best vacations my wife Eleanor and I have ever enjoyed. Our friends Rainer and Marlis are  the easiest people with whom one could ever hope to travel. Like good golfing partners, good traveling companions are rare.

One place we visited was Lake Chiemsee in southern Bavaria, reputed to have been Hitler’s favorite. Evidently, it was also enjoyed by King Ludwig II, sometimes referred to as Mad King Ludwig. Ludwig was in some ways a Francophile. He admired French Kings and French architecture, particularly Versailles Palace. He decided to build a version of Versailles on an island in Lake Chiemsee. He called his project Herrenchiemsee. The only problem Ludwig had with finishing his ersatz Versailles was money. He had simply built too many castles before Herrenchiemsee, including his fantastic magnum opus and eternal post card for Bavarian tourism, Neuschwanstein.

The parts of Herrenchiemsee which were finished before the economic collapse halted work, are beautiful. Perhaps lavish would be a more accurate description.

Ludwig's bed. A candle inside the blue bowl was lit at bedtime to provide ambience.

Ludwig’s bed. A candle inside the blue bowl was lit at bedtime to provide ambience.

After our tour Rainer, Marlis, my wife and I relaxed in the sun with coffee on the front porch. Front porch sounds rather commonplace, but I can’t think of another word. It was during this time I noticed the carvings above the palace windows. I took photos of the kettle drum and tambourine, but it wasn’t until I returned home and began editing my photographs, that I noticed the music.

Front porch of Herrenchiemsee.

Front porch of Herrenchiemsee.

I knew God save the Queen, or King, was of British origin and according to Wikipedia a 1619 attribution is sometimes made to John Bull, or even earlier to Plainchant.  I wondered why this tune would appear in a frieze sculpted for a Bavarian King. My friend David Waterhouse came to my rescue, at least partially. According to Wikipedia, David wrote, “between 1871 and 1918 the tune was known as Heil dir im  Siegerkranz and considered the national anthem of the German Empire” though “never recognized by southern German states such as Bavaria and Württemberg.”  Well, Ludwig was Bavarian, so why would God save the Queen be replicated here? Queen Victoria was on the throne when construction on Herrenchemiesee was begun.

Fortunately my wife saves all the brochures from our trips and I had an e-mail address for Bavaria information. I e-mailed them with my question. For now, it’s in their ball park.

Front yard of Herrenchiemsee.

Front yard of Herrenchiemsee.

Lake Chiemsee and the Bavarian Alps from the deck of the boat to Herrenchiemsee.

Lake Chiemsee and the Bavarian Alps from the deck of the boat to Herrenchiemsee.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 27, 2013 in Commentaries & Critiques, History

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

War Games.

In 1989 as the Iron Curtain began to crumble, I expected and envisioned a dramatic shift of money away from the military industrial complex to our commonweal. Trillions of dollars would be available for the vital social imperatives of health, housing, food, education, research, the arts and the nation’s infrastructure. But this never happened and I now believe our government never envisioned or intended such a shift. War, real or threatened, had become an economic imperative.

After the Seven Years War, (1756-63) British hegemony was practically worldwide, but their national treasury was empty. The military expenses necessary for maintaining the Empire were thrust mainly upon the colonies in America in the form of taxes and duties. These and other burdens increased colonial desires for freedom and eventually led to war. During their retreat to Boston after the skirmishes in Lexinton and Concord, the Battle of Bunker’s Hill (Breed’s Hill) and their forced evacuation of Boston, the British experienced a shocking surprise to which they were never able to adapt – a colonial resolve and apptitude for fighting that may have given some of them a disturbing glimpse into the future.

There were other reasons for Britain losing the war. Among them was an ambivalence within its military command, its soldiers and the British government. British supply lines were too long to be sustainable and the economic strain became intolerable. Foremost however, was an enemy who would never lay down their arms while in defense of their country. Our present political and military leaders would do well toreflect on these facts.

The Civil War or war between the states which began in 1861, was predicted 65 years earlier by signatories to the Declaration of Independence. The toll in lives was ghastly large. Its slogans were Free the Slaves and Save the Union. Southern states were crippled both economically and psychically for many decades after the war, but history has sided with the war’s necessity.

The War to End All Wars, known also as the First World War [1..] and the Second World War were understood by a majority of Americans to be traditional and justifiable conflicts. Whether from fear or suspicion of standing armies, as  has often been suggested, or a general feeling of security provided by two vast oceans or perhaps a lack of interest, when these conflicts were over, the US disarmed.

George Orwell authored the term The Cold War. The Cold War (1947-91) became popular with politicians. It wasn’t a war at all. It was a catchy phrase, useful for justifying US intervention in almost any situation. The cold lasted forty years and helped to undermine the meaning of war.  Complicating the issue even further, President Truman insisted on calling the Korean War a Police Action because it involved United Nations forces. An almost dormant US military struggled to train new soldiers while holding the Pusan Perimeter.[2.]

The United States began its involvement in Vietnam by supplying military advisors. These tactical assistants became combatants after President Johnson, responding to a Domino Theorist and two incidents in the Gulf of Tonkin, lied to Congress. War had gone askew and patriotic US citizens were becoming wary of its governments calls to arm.

During and after The Cold War came an attempted invasion of Cuba, the Cuban Missile Crisis and an Invasion of Granada. [3.]  In the 1990s, the United States joined with UN forces to quell warfare in Eastern and South Eastern Europe. Most recently, the US has become embroiled in the Middle East, western Asia and North Africa. These engagements  were undertaken for the avowed purpose of bringing Democracy to people governed by despots. They were also fought to protect business interests. All have been unsuccessful.

The War in Iraq began with another lie. Displaying a righteous indignation befitting a war expert, US Gen. (Retired) Colin Powell showed the UN and the watching world, proof of Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. Just a short time after the war began, President George W. Bush appeared on a US Navy flight deck and declared to roars of ecstatic approval, ” the war was won.”  It had not been won and a cringing public folded in upon itself from fear of more “incontrovertible truths” they’d be powerless to expose. American military and political leaders had lied and their ‘Wars’ were merely  imbroglios, whose theme was money.

An escalation in rhetoric had accompanied a series of violent crimes: The New York City parking lot bomb explosion, the destruction of the twin towers, the attack on the Pentagon, the suicide bombers in the Arab states and the Boston Marathon murders. The perpetrators of these crimes were called Crazies or extremists, then Fanatics. Fanatics became Islamic Terrorists. When objections arose within the Islamic community, our politicians co-opted Al-Queada and Taliban.

A film loop of hatred, destruction and death having no end and no purpose was playing 24 hours a day in every home. Twenty-two suicides a day occur in the US military services. More military men and women (predominently men) have committed suicide then have died in combat. [4.]

Yet, US military schedules were booked solid. There was Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Egypt,Yemen and always, Palestine and Israel. Syria is looming.

A new Umbrella, a new Hook was needed. Entering stage Right,  “The War on Terror”.

As “The War on Terror” was bandied about, thoughtful people condemned it  for being a meaningless phrase. But they were a small minority quickly cast aside and forgotten by the media. Thought was deemed unsafe for television and was beside the point. War was a hot word from the past. It created visceral and predictable reactions in voters. Further, almost every one of the United States there are military installations of all kinds that employ thousands and infuse billions of dollars into local economies. Capitalists make money and politicians preserve their twin conceits of leadership and relevance. For any capitalist or politician, any war, anywhere, for any reason or lack thereof, was a necessity.

A dangerous transmogrification had occurred. What had begun as our War of Independence was now a slippery obfuscation, “The War on Terror”.

After attending his President’s classified, i.e. secret meetings about Syria, Senator Carl Levin summed up this semantic transformation by saying, ” Terrorism is no longer confined to a few individuals. It is a worldwide movement”.[5.]  Levin didn’t say who or what was creating his Terror nor did he define the Movement. I suspect he couldn’t or was afraid to name names. Whatever he intended, it was a neat excuse for continuing the military industrial status quo.

Listening to politicians talk about terror is a terrifying experience. Not since the war in Vietnam ended, have they had such a munificent “hook” upon which to hang their egos. As self professed leaders of the free world, they  wrap themselves in our nations flag and feign an almighty gravitas while promising to “free the world from terror”. But their actions and words have  finally exposed them. Their ignorance and lack of vision cannot be masked with patriotic anodynes, bluster, blather or bullying.

During a recent Senate committee appearance, Secretary of State John Kerry asked Rand Paul, “Don’t you think it more or less likely that Assad will do it (use chemical weapons) again?” Paul responded logically enough, “It’s unknown”. The prescient Kerry, emboldened by insecurity, yelled across the gap,  “Senator, it is known and I urge you to go to our classified briefings and learn”.

The birth of our nation was assisted by intellectuals, capitalists, soldiers, politicians, artists,  scholars and patriots. Among them, a small group of well read, thoughtful and tenacious people pondered the future. The result was their Declaration of Independence. It contained some of the World’s most provocative thoughts and a vision which helld a vascillating population together.

I believe religions pose a dire threat to our republic, but that threat cannot be met with tanks, planes, submarines and soldiers. Our nation’s health, housing, food, education, research, arts and  infrastructure are in desperate need of attention.

The time for dissembling is over. To insure our survival, It now seems we must foment another revolution to free ourselves from a dependency on war and its mongers. Perhaps our need will produce another group of men and women who can, with wisdom and candor, provoke us once again to act forcefully and courageously on behalf of our interests.

Footnotes:

[1.] Winston Churchill referred to the Seven Years War as the first World War. Known in North America as the French and IndianWar, the Seven Years War pitted Great Britain, Prussia, Hanover, Portugal and the Iroquois Confederacy against France, Spain, Austria, the Mughal Empire, Russia, Sweden and Saxony in battles ranging from the Philippines to India to the Mediterranean countries and Europe, the Caribbean countries and North America. At its conclusion, Britain’s hegemony was world wide.

[2.] See Fehrenbach, T.R.: This Kind of War, T.R. Fehrenbach. 1963.

[3..]  The 1983 invasion of Granada was not a war,  but American military needed exercise. Nineteen of its soldiers were killed and 116 wounded. Granada had a population of 91,000 people and the US sent in 7,000 troops. Politically and militarily, Granada was comparable to Margaret Thatcher’s Falkland War.  255 British soldiers were killed and Thatcher was reelected for a second term. She often remarked about the “Falkland’s spirit”.

[4.] Official US Military statistics as of September 2013.

[5.] Senator Carl Levin (b. 1934) during a PBS News Hour interview, 3 September, 2013.  Levin graduated from Swarthmore college and the Harvard Law School. Elected to the Senate in 1979, he is the Senior United States Senator from Michigan and a member of the Democratic Party. He has announced his resignation from the Senate beginning in 2015.

 
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Admiral Edward Boscawen and a Drumming Tradition.

Edward Boscawen by Sir Joshua Reynolds, c. 1755.

Edward Boscawen by Sir Joshua Reynolds, c. 1755.

Admiral Edward Boscawen,(1711-61) joined the  British Navy at the age of 12 years and remained in its service for the rest of his life. Though he died young, he achieved one of the great careers in British naval history. One example of his success came as commander of the British Blue fleet during the investment of Fortress Louisburg, July,1758, thus providing a staging area for Gen. James Wolfe’s campaign against  Québec City. Boscawen was nicknamed “Wry-necked Dick” due to a habit of cocking his head to one side, as captured by Reynolds in his portrait above.

During the French West Indies campaign, Boscawen took part in capturing the island of Guadaloupe. Lasting from January to May of 1759, the battle resulted in the British wresting Guadaloupe from the French.  In the first Treaty of Paris (1763) France regained the West Indies by relinquishing its claims to Canada.

In his book, As If An Enemy’s Country, Richard Archer wrote: After the conquest of the island of Guadaloupe during the Seven Year War, Admiral Edward Boscawen procured 8 or 10 boys whom he gave to his brother, at the time the commanding officer of the 29th regiment. Boscawen thought the boys would be attractive and exotic ornaments and made them drummers, starting a tradition that continued until 1843. [1.]

Were these Afro-Caribbean boys the genesis of exotically clad Negro or Blackamoor drummers in Britain’s military bands?  After a conversation about Boscawen a scholar friend, David Waterhouse did some research and sent me the following report:

Blackamoor first appears in Lord Berners’s translation of Froissart (1525), referring to two blacke Moores richely apparelled: so already there was the tendency to dress them up.

British Band in St. James courtyard. c. 1790.

British Band in St. James courtyard. c. 1790.

Meanwhile, I think I have tracked down the immediate source of your story about Admiral Boscawen. Hugh Barty-King, in his The Drum (London: The Royal Tournament, 1988), p. 57, says:

“But the man who brought a spate of black drummer appointments in the British army was a naval man, Admiral Boscawen. Being in the Caribbean at the surrender of Guadeloupe in 1759, he cornered ten West Indian boys and brought them home in his ship. Once in England he presented them to his soldier brother who commanded Thomas Farrington’s Regiment, the 29th Foot (late The 1st Battalion Worcestershire Regiment). Permission was obtained from King George III to retain them as drummers, the last of the line dying in July 1843. From then on it became The Thing to have black drummers in British military bands and dress them more and more fancifully…

There is more, both before and after this passage: Barty-King refers to Moorish drummers in the 4th Dragoons as early as 1715.

David sent me the lenghty entry on Adm. Edward Bascawen from the Dictionary of National Biography, published by Oxford University Press in 60 volumes in 2004. There is no mention of him being associated with negro, black or Blackamoor drummers.

“Stories containing incorrect information persist. They are repeated over and over. I don’t know Hugh Barty-King. What was his primary source? You must go back to the primary source.” David Waterhouse

And so gentle reader, until  a primary source is found, we must take the Boscawen story as written by Archer and his probable source Hugh Barty-King, with a grain of salt.

True or not, I believe all the accounts above about Blackamoor and black drummers had to do with Snare Drummers only. Boscawen’s battle for Guadaloupe predated the famous print of a British Band in St. James courtyard by perhaps thirty years and by nine years the disembarkment of the 29th Regiment at Boston. Therfore my next question is, when and by whose order did British bandsmen begin playing Bass drums, Cymbals, Triangles,Tambourines,Tenor drums and the Jingling Johnny? This instrumental component was referred to as the Janissary by British band musicians. [2.] Surely, they were meant not for combat, but for Pomp and Circumstance only.  A Janissary was not with the 29th Regiment in Boston,[3.] as it certainly would have created a sensation and been reported.

Post script:

The Court-marshal and execution of Adm. John Byng (1704-57) was a very controversial and dark affair in British military history. Adm. Boscawen, a strict traditionalist, signed both orders in 1757. Notables including The First Lord of Chatham, William Pitt (1708-80), came to Byng’s defense, but George III refused to repeal the judgement.  Byng knelt on a pillow and instructed the guardsmen to fire when he dropped his handkerchief.

The shooting of Admiral Byng.

The shooting of Admiral Byng.

Footnote:

[1.]  See Archer, Richard under Sources.

[2.] The Janissary, meaning New Soldier, was formed in Turkey by an Ottoman sultan sometime during the late 12th century and disbanded by Sultan Mahmud II in 1826. Young men and boys were kidnapped or otherwise recruited from countries outsideTurkey and trained for duty as bodyguards for the sultan. The Janissary and their music were encountered by the west during European crusades which began in 1096. After their defeat at the second battle of Vienna in 1683, Turkish music instruments were collected from the field of battle by European soldiers. As a sign of respect, Suleiman I sent the Polish hero, Jan Sobieski now King John III, whose cavalry threw back the last Ottoman attack, a troop of Janissaries and its musicians. Not much time passed before composers such as Gluck, Haydn and Mozart made use of the new and exotic Janissary sounds.

[3,.] This was the British occupation referred to in the title of Archer’s book. The Bostonians considered themselves British citizens loyal to the King and were not amenable to being occupied by soldiers. As Archer said: The presence of a standing army was alarming enough to the citizens of Boston, but having armed Irishmen and  Afro-Caribbeans in their midst was a nightmare.

Sources:

a.) Anderson, Fred: The War That Made America: A Short  History of the French and Indian War: Viking  and The War That Made America Llc and French and Indian War 250 Inc. 2005.

b.) Archer, Richard: As If An Enemy’s Country, The British Occupation of Boston and the Origins of Revolution, Oxford University Press, 2010.

c.) Fisccher, David Hackett: Washington’s Crossing: David Hackett Fischer, 2004 and Recorded Books, 2004.

d.) Philbrick, Nathanial: Bunker Hill, A City, A Siege, A Revolution: Penguin Audio Books.

e.) Tourtellot, Authur Bernon: William Diamond’s Drum, Doubleday and Company Inc, 1959.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,